What is NOT a consequence of poor decision-making in aviation?

In the context of aviation, poor decision-making typically leads to negative outcomes that directly affect safety, operations, and scrutiny of piloting. Increased safety measures are often a response to adverse events and do not naturally arise from poor decision-making; rather, they are implemented as a protective measure after incidents occur to prevent future occurrences.

In contrast, accidents and incidents are direct consequences of poor decision-making, as flawed judgments can lead to situations that jeopardize safety. Flight delays can also stem from poor decisions, whether they result from miscalculating flight paths, operational inefficiencies, or inadequate response to changing weather conditions. Furthermore, increased scrutiny of pilot behavior is a common result when there are safety issues or failures, prompting a review of practices to enhance safety and performance standards.

Thus, the option reflecting an increase in safety measures as a result of poor decision-making does not align with typical outcomes associated with such failures in judgment. Instead, it would be viewed as a proactive response aiming to improve safety rather than a direct consequence of poor decision-making.